Doctor Marjorie Nelson: A Hoosier Quaker in Vietnam

The knock on the door of the American teacher’s home came a few days after 80,000 North Vietnamese Army forces and their Viet Cong allies struck South Vietnamese cities and U.S. installations during the Vietnamese Lunar New Year (Tet) holiday in an operation that became known as the Tet Offensive. The country’s ancient imperial capital, Hue, had been one of the major cities attacked.

Marjorie Nelson, a twenty-eight-year-old Society of Friends (Quaker) physician from Kokomo, Indiana, had been staying in Hue for the holiday at the home of Sandy Johnson, an American English teacher at the Dong Khanh school for the International Voluntary Services. “It was really scary: all the bombing, the shelling, the strafing,” Nelson remembered. “We didn’t know if we’d survive.” Sheltering under an improvised bomb shelter—a dining room table piled high with sandbags—as the bloody battle raged around them, the women were discovered on February 5, 1968, by NVA soldiers seeking to use the house as an observation post. Four days later, VC irregulars herded the Americans out of the city and marched them west into the mountains.

For nearly two months, Johnson and Nelson, a 1964 Indiana University School of Medicine graduate, were held as prisoners of war, eventually taken for safekeeping to a mountain camp. During the four months she had been part of a medical team treating horribly injured Vietnamese civilians at an American Friends Service Committee rehabilitation clinic in Quang Ngai Province, Nelson had learned enough Vietnamese to converse with her patients. During her captivity, she quickly developed a stock response when questioned about why she had decided to come to Vietnam. Nelson told the insurgents that she was a Quaker and a pacifist and came to their country because she “did not believe in the war. I told them I had come to help people suffering because of the war and that I wished all the soldiers, on all the sides, could go home. Well, the astonishing thing was that they believed me.”

Although several thousand South Vietnamese soldiers, government officials, and civilians were slaughtered by NVA and VC forces during Hue’s capture, occupation, and recapture, Nelson and Johnson were treated well during their captivity. When Nelson fell ill with dysentery, a “very competent” Vietnamese doctor trained in Hanoi traveled several hours on foot through the mountains to treat her. “The soldiers collected from the meager belongings such things as powdered eggs, a little sugar, and a can of sweetened condensed milk which they gave me ‘to help you regain your strength,’” Nelson recalled. The considerate treatment she received reaffirmed her belief that although nations had differences they could be settled without bloodshed. “Basically, people are the same everywhere,” she emphasized. “If it were left to the world’s peoples instead of governments, there would be peace.”

Released on March 31, Nelson returned to the United States for a brief respite. Being greeted upon her arrival at the Detroit airport by “a mob of cameras, microphones, and bodies” convinced her that she did not “ever want to become a celebrity.” During her time as a POW her mother Elda had died, only hours after Radio Hanoi had announced her daughter’s freedom. When Nelson visited her mother’s grave at a cemetery in Bad Axe, Michigan, the ground was still covered with flowers from the funeral. “I’ve always found cemeteries to be places of comfort and solace,” Nelson later said. “I cherish this one especially. Dozens of my relatives from both sides of my family reaching back at least four generations rest here. Now Mom was at rest here too.” 

Earl Nelson, Marjorie’s father, had been “greatly joyed” when he heard the news about his daughter’s release. “All along I have had confidence and faith in Marjorie’s safety,” he told a reporter. “This faith was based on my knowledge of the image which Quakers have throughout the world—the image of wishing to help human beings no matter who they are.”

Granted a leave of absence by the AFSC after her ordeal, Nelson remained determined to return to Southeast Asia to complete her assignment at the clinic, where she treated civilian victims of the war and trained Vietnamese as nurses, physical therapists, and prosthetists. Before releasing the Americans, the VC, Nelson noted, had asked them, “If we release you, do you promise to go home?” She remembered answering, “Well, yes, of course. We want to see our family and let them know that we’re okay.” She later pointed out, “I told them I would go home, I never said I would not come back. And they never said I couldn’t come back.” She returned to Quang Ngai, finally returning home in 1969 after fulfilling her two-year commitment for the AFSC.

Although Marjorie’s parents had both been teachers in Michigan, her father decided the couple could not raise a family on a teacher’s salary and moved them to Kokomo. Earl found work as a foreman in a newly built Chrysler automobile transmission plant. “He always preferred the midnight-to-morning shift,” Marjorie remembered. “He said he liked to watch the sun come up. For twenty years, he never missed a sunrise.” 

Born on June 24, 1939, Marjorie began her pacifism at an early age, though she would not learn about the term until much later. She remembered when she was five years old her parents had helped to initiate exchanges between their Courtland Avenue Friends Church and a local African Methodist Episcopal Church. One evening, after the service had ended at the AME Church, she heard her parents talking to another couple on their way to their car. One word caught her attention—war. “Daddy,” she asked, “what is war?” He told her war happened when people argued so much it led to them killing one another. Stunned that death would occur from something she and her brother, Keith, had engaged in, Marjorie thought, “What a horrible thing to do. Why would grownups be so stupid?”

The Nelsons instilled in their children tolerance for those less fortunate than themselves. Earl and Elda had worked to help migrant laborers who came to Indiana during the summer to pick tomatoes in local fields. “Several times we had gone as a family to visit migrant camps and share meals with them,” Marjorie wrote in her memoirs. Taking Spanish as her foreign language her first two years in high school, she practiced her skills with the children of the migrant laborers, who were entertained when she made mistakes, for example saying, “Listen to the hen crow” instead of “Listen to the rooster crow.” She remembered one morning when her father came into the kitchen with tears in his eyes. “An infant girl had just died in one of the camps we were working with and the family had no money for a coffin and funeral,” Marjorie said. After making a few phone calls, Earl left home, picked up the deceased child’s grieving father, and together they bought burial clothes and a coffin. “He also arranged for burial and a local pastor as officiant,” she recalled.

Marjorie loved reading, spending half of her childhood absorbed with long-forgotten novels, including Zane Grey adventure novels and Westerns. “My mother used to get so frustrated with me because I had my nose in a book every time she wanted me,” said Marjorie. A shy child, she described herself as having “a terrible inferiority complex,” finding it painful to recite aloud in class. Majorie also found it difficult to convince herself she was both socially and academically equal to her classmates, “even though I did very well in school.” She forced herself to overcome her shyness by participating in the school’s dramatic and speech clubs. “I was encouraged by a couple of teachers who took an interest in me, and it really made the difference,” Marjorie recalled. By the age of twelve she had already undergone a “definite religious experience,” interpreting it as “a call to mission—that is, to work overseas.” That sense of calling never left her.

Elda suffered from Multiple Sclerosis, a debilitating, chronic neurological disorder that eventually led to her being dependent on a wheelchair when venturing beyond her home. “Until she got sick, she was very energetic, a fastidious housekeeper who canned and sewed and cooked, did all those things, and still managed to be very active outside the home,” Marjorie remembered, including helping to run a church daycare center for the children of migrant farm workers. Marjorie often cared for her mother, sparking an interest in pursuing a nursing career. Her aunt Lola, Elda’s sister, worked as a nurse, and Marjorie recalled being “rather in awe of her and her skills. Particularly when I saw her in her white uniform with the stiff, starched cap that she pinned so carefully on top of her dark hair.” Marjorie’s career path changed, however, when a couple who attended her church, Bob Smith, a doctor, and his wife Mary Beth, a nurse, told her she should think about becoming a physician. “From that time on, I planned to be a doctor,” said Marjorie, who dreamed about life as a medical missionary.

After graduating from Kokomo High School in 1956, Marjorie attended Earlham College, majoring in chemistry. She had earned money for her education by working in the Delco-Remy transistor quality-control laboratory. She also attended classes at an Indiana University extension school in Kokomo before entering Earlham as a sophomore. The Quaker institution in Richmond, Indiana, became the “bedrock” for both her and her brother, Beryl. “It influenced the way that we thought about things and motivated us to do things that I’m certain we wouldn’t have done if we hadn’t had the Quaker upbringing,” Beryl said. During her days at Earlham, Marjorie also supported her education by waiting on tables in the dining room, answering phones in the dormitory office at night, and selling postcards in the college’s museum.

Applying to attend the IU School of Medicine the year before she graduated from Earlham, Majorie had to withstand an intense interview before a committee of half a dozen men, who peppered her with such questions as, “Why do you want to go into medicine? Where will you practice? What guarantee do we have that you won’t quit the practice of medicine once you have a family—waste the investment we spent training you?” Nelson endured these queries, not posed to male candidates, and became part of a first-year class that included approximately 180 students, eight of whom were women. “One of the women dropped out in the first week,” she said. “The other seven of us bonded into a tight-knit sisterhood.” Nelson believed it took more stamina than brains to get through medical school. “You just have to work hard,” she pointed out. “You have to read a lot of books, and you have to be able to get by on very little sleep.”

For her internship year, Nelson worked at the Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia with dreams about becoming a medical missionary, working overseas, possibly in Africa. A surgeon at the hospital, Doctor Harvey J. Lerner, suggested she gain some experience by serving on the hospital ship SS Hope, which traveled around the world providing medical services to developing countries. Nelson spent two months aboard the Hope during its 1965 visit to Conakry, the capital of the Republic Guinea on Africa’s west coast, working most of her time at a hospital clinic on shore.

During Nelson’s time studying to become a physician, the war in Vietnam had begun to dominate newspaper headlines. On March 8, 1965, U.S. Marines dressed for battle from the Ninth Marine Expeditionary Force stormed onto the beach outside of Da Nang, South Vietnam. The United States had sent advisers for many years to aid the South Vietnamese government in its fight against VC guerillas supported by Communist North Vietnam, but the March 8 landings represented a major escalation when it came to American troops engaging the enemy. Secretary of State Dean Rusk warned that if the marines were shot at, they would, of course, return fire. A few months after the marines had landed, an editorial in Time supported the growing American presence in South Vietnam, saying the struggle there was “absolutely inescapable for the U.S. in the mid-60s—and in that sense, it is the right war in the right place at the right time.”

Nelson had known for a couple of years that Vietnam “was where I was really supposed to be.” She believed the war was wrong, as it was not “at all according to the way we are to treat our fellowman,” and the United States could not justify its intervention there either on “moral or historical grounds.” Nelson wondered if her Quaker faith might stand up when exposed to war’s ferocity. “Well, I felt I had to find out. I didn’t want to be an armchair quarterback—talking about the way things ought to be, but doing nothing, is too easy. That was a very important issue for me,” she recalled. 

While Nelson prepared to leave the United States in late September 1967 for a two-year commitment working at an AFSC rehabilitation center in Quang Ngai, her brother, Beryl, following his own personal convictions, had sailed away, serving as first mate on a fifty-foot-long ketch, the Phoenix, delivering $10,000 worth of medical equipment for North Vietnamese wounded by American bombing, a mission sponsored by the Quaker Action Group.

Beryl joined the Phoenix crew despite warnings from U.S. government officials that he risked losing his passport and citizenship. He and his sister had discussed the risks involved. “We spent many hours talking about this and agree that we must help people,” Marjorie explained to a reporter from the Kokomo Times. “We are trying to relieve suffering wherever we find it—across political lines.” Beryl believed it was easy for Americans to be a hawk or dove about the war while sitting safely in the comfort of their homes. “But, let them come over here and they may not feel as they do,” he pointed out. “I am only doing something about the way that I feel.”

Before leaving for Vietnam, Marjorie had gone on a sailing trip in Canada with her father. Feeling regretful, she realized she had never asked him how he felt about her journeying into a potentially dangerous spot, with a chance she might never return. Taking her hand, Earl reminded her he and her mother had raised her to “do what you think is right. Now, go ahead and do it and don’t worry about it.”
Nelson arrived at Quang Ngai in October 1967 to start work at the AFSC clinic, which accepted patients without regard to their religious or political affiliation. She had believed that being in a war zone meant normal parts of life stopped, but that was not what she experienced. “Although you could always hear bombing, and there were always planes and helicopters around and army trucks and soldiers everywhere, you came to realize that life does have to go on in spite of the war,” she noted, “and people still fall in love and get married and have children and have to figure out how to raise them, and people still die naturally, and there are funerals and all the rest.”

Although the clinic had opened five months before Nelson came to Vietnam, she was the first doctor to work there. It served 125 to 150 patients per month, of which 80 to 95 percent suffered from wounds caused by the war, including land mines, shrapnel, grenades, and booby traps. Nelson noted that the nearby hospital had no rehabilitation facilities, resulting in many patients being released “permanently crippled who need not have been—either because they lost a leg and couldn’t get an artificial leg or because they had suffered an injury and then did not get proper exercise or physical therapy thereafter.”

Conditions at the hospital were primitive by American standards, with a shortage of doctors (nurses had to do a lot of the surgeries) and no running water in the emergency room. “There were two American military doctors and a Spanish-speaking surgeon full time and two Canadian doctors part-time,” she remembered. “That was it, for six or seven hundred patients in a four-hundred-twenty-bed hospital.” Conditions did later improve, as the South Vietnamese government began to assign military doctors to province hospitals and assistance came from the U.S. Agency for International Development.

There were times when what she saw became too much for Nelson. She made rounds at a temporary ward established for patients selected for rehabilitation, surgical wards, and, for a time, the burn ward. Patients in the burn ward included those injured in domestic accidents involving cooking fires and spilled pots, as well as those horribly disfigured from napalm, phosphorous bombs, and general explosives. “Maybe, during a firefight, the thatch of a house would ignite—we didn’t call them firefights for nothing, I guess,” Nelson said. Because of inadequate facilities, most of the burn patients were left in bed to see if they might get better on their own; many did not. She estimated that treating ten burn patients would have exhausted all their resources, which otherwise could have cared for fifty or seventy-five amputees or orthopedic cases. “In short, it was a very depressing situation. I finally realized I was not going to be able to function if I continued to go into that burn ward, I could not help all of those people,” Nelson confessed. “I found the suffering so overwhelming that I was simply immobilized. So I quit going. I had to.”

With the hospital emptying with the approach of the Tet holiday in early 1968, Nelson accepted an invitation from a Vietnamese woman she worked with to visit her in Hue. “I was very interested in visiting this woman’s family, also in seeing some of the cultural aspects of this country that I was getting to know,” she recalled. “Certainly, nobody I talked to knew there was going to be Tet offensive.” The NVA soldiers who took Nelson and Johnson prisoner were quite well organized, knowing the names and locations of all the foreigners that lived in Hue. Nelson remembered that their captors told them they were going to be taken to the mountains “to study,” and when there was peace they would be returned to their families. “That sounded sort of ominous,” she said, “and we really thought we were in for the duration of the war.”

Nelson and Johnson spent about ten days at a small mountain camp with twenty-five American men (some military and some civilian) captured at Hue. Nelson provided medical treatment to some of the prisoners, who were eventually taken to Hanoi. The VC separated the women from the other prisoners and took them to another mountain camp, assigning them to a small house built out of bamboo, saplings, and jungle leaves, and equipped with a bomb shelter. “We were frequently shelled or bombed, so it was tense,” Nelson said, “but we were not confined in any way. We were free to move about.” The number-one rule, they were warned by Bon, a veteran of the fight against the French, was simple: “Don’t Escape!” 

Both Nelson and Johnson laughed heartily when they heard Bon’s order. “I didn’t want to walk anywhere in those mountains without an armed escort and a guide who knew where we were,” said Nelson, who remembered Johnson telling her about one of the soldiers seeing a tiger. The VC occasionally gave the Americans books and pamphlets with their version of the war’s history to read but made no attempt to indoctrinate or threaten them in any way, according to Nelson.

Often asked by the VC if she had any requests, Nelson responded by saying she wanted to be able to write her family, so she could tell them she was safe. She also asked to continue to study Vietnamese. Finally, Nelson wanted to continue to help wounded civilians. “I explained that I wasn’t willing to work in the military but that I was willing to work in Communist Vietnam if I could work in a civilian setting,” she said. The VC allowed her to write her family and continue studying Vietnamese, but declined her offer of medical assistance, telling her, Nelson remembered, “We would never ask you to live under such difficult circumstances. We appreciate your offer, but we don’t need your help.” 

At first, Nelson believed the real motive for turning down her last request had been “a polite way of refusing an offer that was politically unacceptable, that they did not want to admit they needed help.” Later, she learned that the Vietnamese had some “bad experiences” with the Americans they kept in captivity who wanted to collaborate. “Americans just didn’t survive very well under jungle conditions,” Nelson noted. “They got malaria, they needed more calories than a Vietnamese, their resistance was very low.”

Just before the VC released Nelson and Johnson, the Americans met with the ten or twelve soldiers then in the camp for a goodbye party. One of the men brought a dishpan filled with peanut brittle and a few canteens of tea, which they ate and drank and discussed life in America. The camp’s commander was particularly interested in whether Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy might win the election and, if so, would end the war. Nelson shared her belief that Kennedy might well end the war, but for the wrong reasons. “I think he will end the war not because he thinks America is wrong, that we shouldn’t be in Vietnam,” she explained, “but because he thinks the war is costing too much. The American people are not willing to pay the cost—you know, the casualties and the money both are beginning to wear on people.” The commander listened and agreed that her explanation made sense. Finally, he asked them if instead of using the word “prisoner” when they returned home, they would “consider ourselves to have been their guests,” Nelson recalled.

As to why they were freed, Nelson supposed it had happened due to several reasons. She credited it to the will of God, as well as because of the excellent relationship Quakers had established with the Vietnamese. She pointed out that she and others involved with Quaker projects in the country “had always been assured that no harm would come to members of the Quaker team.” Nelson also credited Beryl for his efforts on her behalf, including flying to Phnom Penh, Cambodia, to talk with North Vietnamese officials at their embassy. “Another explanation might be that the local people who got to know me sent a report up and said they thought it would be in the best interest of North Vietnam to let us go,” Nelson noted.

Upon returning to the Quang Ngai rehabilitation clinic in September 1968, Nelson took up her old duties as well as providing medical treatment to inmates at a local prison. Originally built by the French to house 500 inmates, the prison, during the time Nelson worked there, had a population ranging from 800 to 1,300, a number that included 150 to 300 women. “Many of these women had their children with them—40 to 120 children,” she remembered. According to the inmates, about 80 percent of them had been incarcerated for such “political” crimes as having improper or incomplete papers, being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or, for many women, an “inability to account for the whereabouts of their husbands, who were therefore assumed to be guerrillas.”

Nelson also regularly examined inmates who had been tortured, not at the prison but at the nearby Province Interrogation Center, which she said a U.S. adviser told her had been a project begun by the Americans to teach “enlightened intelligence and interrogation procedures.” Nelson later testified before a House Committee on Government Operations that she saw dozens of patients suffering from bruises of varying severity, as well as those “who had coughed up, vomited or urinated blood after being beaten about the chest, back and stomach.” She went on to accuse South Vietnamese officials of torturing people with electricity by attaching wires “to ears, nipples and genitalia; by being forced to drink concoctions containing powdered lime and other noxious substances, and by being tied up and suspended by ropes upside down from the rafters for hours.” A South Vietnamese province chief, a Colonel Khien, Nelson remembered, acknowledged to her that some beatings had occurred at the center, but some of the prisoners were “‘very hard’ and refuse to talk, and in such situations physical force was necessary and was employed to get information.” The colonel did add: “There are limits.”

Although Nelson admitted it was difficult decision for her to leave Vietnam, she left to return to the United States to marry Robert Perisho, a Yale University graduate student studying physics. They married in 1971 and had a son, Christopher Robert. In 1975 the family moved to Salt Lake City, where Robert died from encephalitis. After working as the medical director for Planned Parenthood in Utah, Marjorie and her son moved to Athens, Ohio, where she eventually joined the faculty of the Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine. Up until and after her retirement in 2009, she returned to Vietnam, doing volunteer work for the nonprofit Madison Quakers Inc. Nelson acknowledged that a part of her heart would “always remain in that patch of land and water—Quang Ngai.”

Before her death from a stroke on December 29, 2022, Nelson had been selected for inclusion in the Howard County Historical Society’s Howard County Hall of Legends. She had remained committed to her Quaker pacifism throughout her life, protesting paying U.S. taxes for military spending, especially when it came to nuclear war, by writing “war tax deduction” on her tax returns. The Internal Revenue Service responded by fining her $500 for filing a “frivolous tax return.” Nelson believed the fine had been a way for the federal government to place limits on her free speech rights. “It seems to me the government’s main purpose should be to collect taxes, not to stifle a statement of conscientiousness,” she told an Associated Press reporter in 1984. “I get the feeling the government is trying to chill dissent, to intimidate people so they won’t speak up over issues of conscience.”

Her actions seemed true to the character of what Nelson’s father once described as a person always looking “for ways to live out her belief that war is wrong and that the lives of all people are to be valued.”
             

A Ship for Peace

In the early afternoon of December 4, 1915, a crowd estimated at anywhere from 3,000 to 15,000 braved the brisk weather at a pier in Hoboken, New Jersey, in order to witness the sailing of the Scandinavian-American ship Oscar II. The ship was set for a scheduled ten-day trip across the Atlantic Ocean to Christiania (today Oslo), Norway.

As the ship prepared to leave, the crowd sang and cheered as bands played such rousing songs as “I Didn’t Raise My Boy to Be a Soldier” and “Onward, Christian Soldiers.” The biggest cheers, however, were reserved for the sponsor of this unusual adventure: famed automaker Henry Ford. The previous summer Ford had declared his willingness to devote his fortune to ending the fighting in Europe between the Allied Powers, led by Great Britain and France, and the Central Powers, dominated by Germany and Austria-Hungary.

Unable to discover any just reasons for the war, Ford believed that some nations “were anxious for peace and would welcome a demonstration for peace.” With the encouragement of Rosika Schwimmer, a Hungarian author, lecturer, and peace advocate, Ford had secured passage on the Oscar II for about sixty delegates in support of his mission. These delegates would attempt to halt the bloody trench warfare being fought with such deadly weapons as the machine gun and poison gas through the establishment of a neutral commission that would offer negotiation among the nations then at war.

Indiana educator and woman’s rights leader May Wright Sewall was one of the more than a hundred people, including such famous individuals as inventor Thomas Edison, reformer Jane Addams, and former president William Howard Taft to receive invitations from Ford to join him on the voyage. The first word of the trip came to Sewall in late November when she received a telegram from Ford, followed three days later by a letter in which the automobile maker spelled out in more detail his reasons for asking her to join him and others on the trip. “From the moment I realized that the world situation demands immediate action, if we do not want the war fire to spread any further,” Ford wrote, “I joined those international forces which are working toward ending this unparalleled catastrophe.”

In describing her fellow delegates for her friends in Indianapolis, Sewall agreed that no one had an “exalted position; not one bearing the stamp of worldwide recognition.” Through their work, however, Sewall said the delegates hoped to accomplish three goals: to secure the public’s attention, turning it from war to peace; to stimulate other private efforts and encourage workers to seek peace in every country; and confirm on all those involved their resolution to work for a permanent peace.

Before embarking on his peace crusade, Ford had met with President Woodrow Wilson to try to convince him to appoint an official neutral commission, which Ford was willing to back financially. Although noting he agreed in principle with the idea of mediation to stop the war, Wilson skillfully avoided endorsing Ford’s proposal.

Press reaction to Ford’s mission had been, at best, mixed. Some newspapers gave the automobile tycoon high marks for his good intentions, but most were skeptical about his chances at accomplishing his mission. The New York Evening Post boldly predicted that Ford’s plan would “be acclaimed by thoughtful hundreds of thousands the world over as a bit of American idealism in an hour when the rest of the world has gone mad over war and war preparedness.” Other newspapers were unstinting in their scorn, calling the effort “one of the cruelest jokes of the century” and “an impossible effort to establish an inopportune peace.”

When the Oscar II steamed away on December 4, it had onboard peace delegates described as “negligible” in standing by some observers. The group, however, included a respectable number with solid reputations, not only Sewall, but magazine publisher S. S. McClure, Reverend Jenkin Lloyd Jones, and Judge Ben Lindsey. Also on the ship were approximately 25 students representing institutions as diverse as Vassar, Princeton University, Purdue University, and the University of California at Berkley. There were also fifty members of the press, including reporters from United Press, the Associated Press, and the International News Service.

In assessing her fellow delegates for her friends in Indiana, Sewall acknowledged that no one in the party had an “exalted position; not one bearing the stamp of worldwide recognition.’ [I would argue she missed one person—herself.] She added, however, that none of the delegates were “hair-brained lunatics bent on a fool’s errand—but rather a company of clear-headed but simple-hearted men and women, with no illusions in regard to ourselves but with the faith that any one of us, much more all of us with God, constitutes a majority in the council where each next stop along the path of human progress is determined.”

Through their work, Sewall said the delegates hoped to accomplish three goals: to secure the public’s attention, diverting it from war to peace; to stimulate other private initiatives and encourage workers for peace in every country; and confirm on all involved their resolution to work for a permanent peace.

Once at sea, the delegates attempted to establish a regular routine. Each day at 11:00 a.m. the students met to learn more about the attempt to bring an end to the fighting in Europe. Each session opened with a talk by one of the delegates on a subject in which they were regarded as an expert. The delegates themselves listened to similar speakers daily at 4 p.m. and 8:30 p.m., becoming better acquainted with each other through such gatherings.

Sewall’s optimism and dedication to the peace process impressed other delegates. One of them, John D. Barry, an essayist, poet, and critic, said that in spite of Sewall’s age she proved to be one of the “most useful members of the party, keen, and quick of mind, bubbling over with information and observation, humorous, kindly and above all human.”

Ford’s goodwill to all on the voyage tamed the hearts of some of the cynical newspapermen. Florence Latimore of Survey magazine later related that a reporter had confided to her that his employers had told him to produce satirical articles about the trip, but after seeing Ford’s face he could not bring himself to follow their orders. Still another newsman told Latimore: “I came to make fun of the whole thing, but my editor is going to have the surprise of his life. I tell you I believe in Henry Ford and I’m going to say so even if I lose my job for it.”

Other reporters remained unconvinced and treated the voyage with derision. A London newspaperman even went as far to send a fake story about Ford being held prisoner in his cabin, chained to his bed by his staff. But when the Oscar II’s captain, J. W. Hempel, who reviewed all messages sent from the ship, took some of the more insulting stories to Ford, he responded kindly, telling Hempel: “Let them send anything they please. I want the boys to feel perfectly at home while they are with me. They are my guests. I wouldn’t for the world censor them.”

Legend has it that one delegate became so upset about what he viewed as an inaccurate report from Hoosier Elmer Davis, covering the voyage for the New York Times, that he called him “a snake in the Garden of Eden.” Davis responded by forming what he described by a Snakes in the Garden of Eden Club.

The real blowup came when the ship received a wireless report about a speech to Congress by Wilson calling for increased military preparedness. In trying to craft a response to the speech, sharp disagreements erupted among the delegates, with some calling for immediate disarmament and others arguing that countries should have the necessary means to defend themselves. Although the argument ended in a compromise, the incident prompted reporters to wire stories back to their newspapers about “mutiny” and “war” breaking out on the peace ship.

Early in the morning on December 18, the Oscar II docked in Christiania, Norway. Physically, Sewall said, Norway gave the delegates a cold welcome, as the weather was reportedly the chilliest in more than a hundred years. The peace expedition had barely had time to settle into its new setting when it received a bitter blow: Ford had decided to go home. Unable to shake the cold he had caught on the voyage, and encouraged to do so by his staff, Ford had decided to leave in time to catch a ship bound for America.

According to Louis P. Lochner, Ford’s private secretary, who had been “deeply shocked” by his boss’s appearance when he visited Ford in his hotel room, the automaker told him: “Guess I had better go home to mother [his wife Clara]. You’ve got this thing started now and can get along without me.” Lochner attempted to convince Ford to stay with the expedition, but failed.

Upon his return to America, Ford told the media he had not deserted the Peace Ship and offered no regrets for sponsoring the expedition. He noted that “the sentiment we have aroused by making the people think will shorten the war.” With Ford’s departure, the delegates turned for leadership to a committee. Policy matters were handled by Schwimmer and finances were the responsibility of Ford staff member Gaston Plantiff. (Ford is estimated to have spend a half-million dollars on the expedition, approximately $15.5 million today.)

The peace expedition spent a week in Stockholm, developing a regular schedule. Each morning at 10:00 a.m. the delegates met to discuss the day’s activities. From 11:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., the group hosted a reception at the hotel open to the public. The delegates had time to themselves until 4:00 p.m., when the expedition hosted a second public reception.

Sewall observed that visitors to the receptions seemed to fall into four categories: teachers, feminists, social reformers, and students. “I was particularly interested in the university students,” she said, “who, although it was their holiday week, called in great numbers. I was amazed by both the intelligence, and by the lively interest in serious subjects of these young people, whom I was mentally comparing with my young countrymen and countrywomen of student age to the distinct disadvantage of the latter.”

In order to reach the group’s final stop, the Netherlands, the delegates had to travel, via a sealed train, through German territory, a feat accomplished through the help of the American minister to Denmark. Once in the Netherlands, the group selected delegates for a proposed Neutral Conference for Continuous Mediation, which had its headquarters in Stockholm and worked to negotiate an end to the war.

With this final task completed, the delegates and students could finally return home. On January 15, 1916, the delegates left port aboard the SS Rotterdam for the voyage back to America (the students had left four days earlier on another ship).

For Sewall, the “spectacular pilgrimage” had been a success, as it had “concentrated the thought of the distracted world upon this hope with a force that assures its achievement.” She felt proud of the work done by her and her fellow delegates. “To have advanced its [peace’s] arrival by one hour,” Sewall said, “is adequate compensation for the cost in money, time and sacrifices of the Expedition if multiplied a thousandfold.”

Sewall’s view was shared in part by one of the reporters aboard the Oscar II, Elmer Davis. Although he considered the trip a “crazy enterprise,” Davis, looking back on the voyage in an essay published in 1939 as Europe seemed on the brink of another war, said that any effort, “however visionary and inadequate, to stop a war that was wrecking Europe, appears in retrospect a little less crazy than most of the other purposes that were prevalent in Europe in 1916.”

 

Eli Lilly, Archaeology, Glenn Black, and the Indiana Historical Society

In the fall of 1930 a staff member of the Smithsonian Institution, Frank Setzler, assistant curator for archaeology, ran across a visitor from the Hoosier State. Setzler, who had worked as a surveyor for the Indiana Historical Society before migrating to Washington, DC, had been won over by the man’s passion for the subject, so much so that he wrote a letter to his old boss, Christopher B. Coleman. “I think the [archaeology] committee will be very fortunate to have such a man working with it,” Setzler told Coleman. “He seemed earnestly interested in the work and willing to learn all there is to know. . . . More men of his type will certainly boost archaeology in Indiana.”

Setzler was correct. The man he was writing about, Eli Lilly, businessman and future president of his family’s Indianapolis pharmaceutical company, certainly boosted archaeology in the state through his own efforts researching and writing about the subject, but also from his financial support of the archaeology program through the IHS. Subsequently, Lilly became more and more involved in the IHS’s other activities, serving as its president from 1933 to 1946 and as a trustee until his death in 1977; writing books on a variety of Indiana subjects (Prehistoric Antiquities of Indiana, published in 1937); supporting significant publications from other authors (as examples, R. C. Buley’s Pulitzer Prize-winning book The Old Northwest: Pioneer Period, 1815–1840 and the multivolume The Diary of Calvin Fletcher); paying the salaries and/or underwriting the education of such prominent staff members as Glenn A. Black and Gayle Thornbrough; and offering significant sums (without publicity) for the organization’s endowment, as well as expanded facilities. As Setzler noted, Lilly’s association with the IHS had “been among the pleasantness that I have had in this lower mundane institute.”

Before Lilly’s involvement the IHS had experienced some difficult times since its creation on December 11, 1830, when more than half the members of the legislature and several Indiana Supreme Court judges had gathered at the Marion County Courthouse to consider forming a historical society to collect and preserve material about the nineteenth state’s past. John H. Farnham, one of the IHS’s founders and its corresponding secretary, said at the initial meeting that those in attendance fully impressed with the importance and necessity of collecting and preserving the materials for a comprehensive and accurate history of our country, natural, civil and political, many of which are of an ephemeral and transitory nature, and in the absence of well directed efforts to preserve them are rapidly passing into oblivion.”

Unfortunately, the IHS failed to achieve all Farnham, who died in a cholera epidemic in 1833, had hoped for despite several tries at reorganization and leadership attempts from such notable Hoosiers as John Brown Dillon and John Coburn. “Its existence has been very quiet,” Indiana historian Jacob P. Dunn Jr. said of the group. “So quiet at times as to suggest death.” Dunn, along with fellow amateur historians William H. English and Daniel Wait Howe, worked to revitalize the organization in the 1880s, and began its long tradition of publishing monographs. Further assistance to the IHS’s mission to collect “all materials calculated to shed light on the natural, civil, and political history of Indiana” came in 1922 with a generous $150,000 bequest from Delavan Smith to establish a memorial library in honor of his father, William Henry Smith (after whom the IHS’s library is named), as well as donating items on Indiana history collected by both Smiths.

Lilly’s enthusiasm for archaeology and increasing role with the IHS led to a lasting friendship with Black, a former salesman, “estimating engineer” for an Indianapolis company, and musician, which, in turn, led to the organization’s involvement in saving one of the state’s most important archaeological sites—Angel Mounds, located on the Ohio River in Vanderburgh and Warrick Counties and built between 1000 and 1450 AD by people of the Mississippian culture. The two men admired one another, with Lilly saying that as he saw it, Indiana archaeology depended on Black, while Black wrote in 1960 that Lilly was the “one person essentially responsible for what has been achieved in the field of prehistory through the Indiana Historical Society during the last three decades.”

Self-educated in archaeology, Black first became familiar with Lilly in May 1931 when he served as a driver and guide for a tour of the state’s most important archaeological sites in southern Indiana with William King Moorehead, the well-known director of the Robert S. Peabody Foundation for Archaeology in Andover, Massachusetts. “The memory of the three delightful days in your expedition,” Lilly later wrote Moorehead, “will always be a happy one.”

Both Lilly and Moorehead were impressed by Black. “Mr. Black is an intelligent and willing worker and I am certain will make good. I predict a future for him,” Moorehead wrote Lilly, who hired Black to do archaeological work and initially funded his field expenses and $225 per month salary. To improve Black’s credentials with others involved in the field, the IHS, with Lilly’s approval, sent the young man to study from October 1931 to May 1932 at the Ohio State Museum under Henry C. Shetrone, an expert in the mound builders. 

Lilly subsequently paid Black’s salary as the IHS’s archaeologist through contributions to the organization, the only way, he noted, he could “get credit on my income tax.” As usual for such contributions, Lilly made it a condition that he receive no publicity for his generosity. The investment certainly paid off. As Coleman wrote Lilly in November 1938, Black was so “thoroughly devoted to archaeology and such a fine person in every respect that it is difficult to put a money value on his services.”

One of Black and Lilly’s major achievements was securing the approximately 400-acre Angel Mounds site from destruction—a process that Black described as including “a long period of interest, watchful waiting, diligent effort, and sacrifice on the part of the a few people in Indiana in whose hearts was a wish that this site be preserved at all costs.” The site had fascinated Lilly for many years and he had included a description of it in his book Prehistoric Antiquities of Indiana and wondered why no significant archaeological investigations had been made there. “What would we not give to reverse the film of prehistory to a view of the teeming life within this village, its boisterous play, sweat-producing work, revered ceremonies, bloody wars, and the general way of living?” he asked, urging the state to rescue Angel Mounds from possible oblivion and thus saving for posterity “another of our pre-Columbian heritages.”

The Angel Mounds site had attracted national interest in the early 1930s, with Black accompanying a National Park Service official, Vern Chaterlaine, on a tour of the area with an eye toward acquiring it for the government. In August 1932 Lilly met with Coleman and other IHS officers to discuss the idea of purchasing the private properties “at a reasonable price” and having the organization’s archaeological committee manage the site. Black noted that Lilly had agreed to assume the expense, upkeep, and explorations at Angel Mounds for a few years, and then the IHS might possibly “give the mounds to the State or Nation as a park.” That attempt failed.

Six years later, with Evansville growing and the danger increasing that Angel Mounds might be swallowed up by development or possible encroachment from flood-prevention projects, there was an increased urgency to buy the site. Black set out to obtain support for doing so from Evansville civic organizations, politicians, and media. “Enthusiasm varied, naturally,” Black recalled, “but no one voiced opposition to the proposal that the site be saved, explored and, ultimately, restored.” Black and others also lobbied the Evansville Plan Commission to prevent, if it could, for a reasonable time, “further realty development in the neighborhood of the mounds.” He noted that this step had to be taken as a precautionary measure “to prevent spiraling land prices in the event that the attempt to acquire the property failed at that time.”

Although both the Evansville Courier and Evansville Press cooperated with Black’s effort in every way, including publishing editorials backing the project and cartoons with Courier staff artist Karl Kae Knecht, sufficient public donations never materialized (only $127 had been collected locally). “It made it very difficult, and embarrassing,” Black reflected, “to approach ‘outsiders’ when financial support in Evansville was completely lacking.” With “great reluctance,” and knowledge that options on the land purchases were soon set to expire, Black wrote to Lilly in early October 1938, including a statement covering the amount of funds needed to complete the land purchase, as it was “barely possible that we may receive unsuspected support at the last moment and we shall not give up trying until that time arrives.”

Lilly, who previously had donated $11,000 to the IHS to be “borrowed” for some land options set to expire in July, went even further with his generosity, giving the organization another $57,000 to, as he noted, “prevent the destruction of the mounds at Evansville.” In 1939, under Black’s direction and with the assistance of workers funded by the Works Progress Administration, archaeological excavations began at Angel Mounds. (Today the site is owned and operated by the state of Indiana, and Indiana University’s Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology does research and excavations.)

Preservation of Angel Mounds came at just the right time. Black had noted that while he and others were trying to raise the money necessary to purchase the land holdings, they continually stressed that in Indiana and around the country, “we were . . . destroying our heritage at an alarming rate.” An expanding American economy and population, he was sure, meant that large archaeological sites such as Angel Mounds were sure to be lost. “Even spots of green in the form of fields and woods, adjacent to centers of population density,” he noted, “would be rarities.” Black said he and others did not know, in 1938, how “prophetic we were being,” as in the future the site would be encroached upon by expanding residential areas.

After saving Angel Mounds, Lilly kept a keen interest in progress at the site and continued his close friendship with Black. Lilly’s interest included such mundane matters as controlling weeds at the property by allowing Black to purchase the proper equipment needed to handle the problem, as well as making sure that the house Black and his wife occupied on the site had the necessary sanitary facilities. “It seems to me that we cannot ask Mr. and Mrs. Black to reside in those parts without such equipment,” Lilly wrote Coleman in March 1939, “and I move you, sir, that we instruct him to have proper arrangements made and charged to the archaeological funds.”

Angel Mounds proved to be a busy place in the late 1930s and early 1940s, as Black, who called the effort one of “the most rewarding experiences” of his life, oversaw excavations at the site by workers hired through the federal government’s Works Progress Administration, with the Indiana Historical Bureau serving as the project’s sponsor.

Largely untrained in archaeological practices, the 277 men, most in their thirties and forties, who toiled at the site from April 27, 1939, to May 22, 1942, for the public works project processed approximately 2.3 million archaeological items. “There were men from farm, factories, and offices. . . . There was a retired minister, a trained tree surgeon, and one paroled homicide [convict],” Black recalled. “But so far as we were concerned, we made it a point to ignore backgrounds and concentrate on the tasks at hand. We considered one of these tasks to relate to the men themselves—to explore their personal potential and get as much out of them as possible.” In his time with the WPA workers, his admiration and respect for their “inherent ability, ‘native’ honesty, and ingenuity increased tremendously.”

In 1944 Black joined Indiana University as a lecturer, eventually teaching three courses: North American archaeology, Ohio Valle archaeology, and archaeological methods and techniques. With the end of World War II, Black wanted to restart field work at Angel Mounds. “A conviction grew that the site was actually an outdoor classroom of almost inexhaustible proportions; why not use it as such,” Black exclaimed. With the approval of the IHS and IU, field schools were held at Angel Mounds each year from 1945 through 1962, giving students practical training that paid “dividends in the years which they devote later to field archaeology,” said Black, who was recognized for his outstanding work in archaeology with an honorary degree from Wabash College in 1958.

The hard work Black engaged in took a toll on his health. After experiencing some trouble with his heart in the early 1940s, he received a letter from Lilly telling him to take time off from Angel Mounds if his doctors advised him to do so. “One Glenn Black is worth all the mounds, villages, and camp sites in the Mississippi Valley so do listen to reason,” Lilly wrote. “Do be sensible, young fellow, and reassure your old friend that you are doing the very best for yourself—and all of us.”

Black, who succumbed to a fatal heart attack on September 2, 1964, came to hold Lilly with the esteem a son has for a father, and the two men, and their wives, often visited each other’s homes and took vacations together. “You have been my ‘father,’ friend and councilor,” Black wrote Lilly in 1958. “More than anything else I have wanted to please you and give you no cause to regret that we ever took that first archaeological trip together in May 1931.” A touched Lilly replied that if he had a son, he would want him “to have character and abilities equal to yours.”

Lilly made certain that Black’s achievements at Angel Mounds were recognized, including his research on the work at the site. The archaeologist had almost finished the project before his death, and his friend did all he could do, including financially, to see the work published, helped in no small part by contributions from Doctor James H. Kellar, Black’s student and the first director of the Glenn Black Laboratory of Archaeology at IU, and HIS editor Gayle Thornbrough. In 1967 the IHS published Black’s two-volume work, Angel Site: An Archaeological, Historical, and Ethnological Study. The book received wide praise, with Ethnohistory describing it as “a landmark in New World archaeology.” The Lilly Endowment had helped fund the construction of the Black Lab at IU and provided aid to build an interpretive center at Angel Mounds.

Until his death on January 24, 1977, Lilly continued his long association with the IHS, including a million-dollar donation to help build an addition to the Indiana State Library, dedicated in October 1976, which provided space for the IHS staff and library. Upon Lilly’s death, the IHS learned that its longtime benefactor had left the organization in his will 10 percent of his holdings (309,904 shares of stock) in Eli Lilly and Company. He ensured that the institution could continue to play a major role in championing Indiana history in the future, as it did with Angel Mounds. Lilly’s foresight provided the IHS with the means to consistently operate as one of the leading private state historical societies in the country. Lilly’s decades of involvement and support had elevated IHS to be worthy of John Farnham’s founding vision in 1830.

 

Celebrating Statehood: The Indiana Centennial

The fall of 1914 was a bloody one in Europe. The British and German were winding down the First Battle of Ypres and would soon dig in to begin the long and futile period of trench warfare. On the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, however, it was an election year. On November 3 Hoosiers trooped to the polls and “for a time the war dropped into the background as all Indiana played the election game,” wrote Cedric C. Cummins in his book on public opinion during World War I.

In addition to the usual candidates on the ballot, voters had the chance to register their opinions on two special issues: a convention to alter the state’s constitution and whether to celebrate the state’s centennial in 1916 by appropriating two million dollars for the construction of a memorial building to house the state library and other historical agencies. Both measures suffered defeat at the polls.

Democratic governor Samuel M. Ralston, who became a leading force behind the state’s eventual centennial observance, believed the memorial plan was rejected not because Hoosiers were against celebrating the event, but because they objected to the amount of money sought for the building.

Ralston was proven right; in just two years, backed by the efforts of the Indiana Historical Commission and thousands of volunteers, Indiana residents would see the creation of state parks, the beginnings of an improved statewide road system, the creation of permanent memorials in numerous communities, and an overall awakening of interest in the nineteenth state’s history.

At Governor Ralston’s request, the 1915 Indiana General Assembly agreed to appropriate $25,000 and create a nine-member Indiana Historical Commission to promote the centennial celebration. The legislature’s financial support of the commission marked the first notable state commitment of funds to history in Indiana. Of the $25,000, $20,000 was earmarked for the promotion of centennial activities, while the remaining amount went to collecting, editing, and publishing Indiana’s past.

The IHC first met on April 23 and 24, 1915, in Governor Ralston’s Statehouse office. An illustrious group joined Ralston on the commission, including James Woodburn of Indiana University, Reverend John Cavanaugh of the University of Notre Dame, and Charity Dye, an Indianapolis schoolteacher. The commission employed Professor Walter C. Woodward of Earlham College to direct the centennial celebration.

The commission set out to educate the state’s citizens about the centennial. Special bulletins were sent to county school superintendents asking for their cooperation; direct appeals were made to teachers in the summer and fall of 1915; a weekly IHC newsletter began publication; and commission members addressed various clubs, civic organizations, churches, and historical societies (Dye alone gave 152 talks).

The IHC also turned to film to get its message across to the public. Realizing it had neither the necessary funds nor skills needed to undertake such an enterprise, the commission called upon the public for help. Citizens soon responded by forming the Inter-State Historical Pictures Corporation, which contracted with the Selig Polyscope Company of Chicago to produce a movie titled Indiana. The seven-reel picture featured famed poet James Whitcomb Riley telling the story of the state’s development to a group of children.

To encourage former Indiana residents to return to the state for the centennial, the commission used the services of noted humorist and author George Ade. Honored, or “burdened,” Ade joked in speeches touting the centennial, with the chairmanship of the committee to “sound the call and bring all the wandering Hoosiers back into the fold,” he set about recruiting contributions from a veritable who’s who of Hoosiers for a book.

Titled An Invitation to You and Your Folks from Jim and Some More of the Home Folks, the book, published by Bobbs-Merrill Company of Indianapolis, contained messages from Governor Ralston, Vice President Thomas Marshall, Meredith Nicholson, and Booth Tarkington. Gene Stratton-Porter contributed the poem “A Limberlost Invitation,” and Riley the poem “The Hoosier in Exile.”

With its publicity campaign on its way to being a success, the commission had to turn its sights to how best to state the actual celebration; keeping in mind the lack of funds, it was clear that such events would have to be financed locally. The IHC turned to staging historical pageants. These dramas appealed strongly to the commission because they could both focus attention on Indiana’s history and bring communities together.

The commission hired William Chauncy Langdon, former first president of the American Pageant Association, as the state pageant master. Langdon’s main duties were to write and direct three pageants, one at Indiana University, another at the old state capital of Corydon, and a final one at Indianapolis. Historical studies were made, music was especially composed, and costumes were designed “for the sole purpose of producing in the sequence of its various scenes a clear, beautiful and inspiring drama and a truthful impression of the development of the State of Indiana,” noted Langdon.

These same ideas were used by local communities in developing their own pageants. The commission gave what help it could, securing centennial chairmen in all but three of Indiana’s counties, with each responsible for selecting a county committee to plan the work. The plan worked. Director Woodward reported that forty-five county or local pageants presented in 1916 were seen by an estimated 250,000 people, and anywhere from 30,000 to 40,000 Hoosiers participated in the performances.

Along with the week-long pageant in Indianapolis, capital residents had the chance to hear from President Woodrow Wilson as part of activities for Centennial Highway Day on October 12, 1916. Invited to speak by Governor Ralston, a vigorous supporter of roadway improvements, Wilson arrived in the city by presidential train (which was late). While in Indianapolis, the president reviewed an automobile parade before delivering a speech on the need for good roads to 10,000 people at the Fairgrounds Coliseum.

Perhaps the commission’s crowning achievement came with the development of Indiana’s first state parks. The movement began in April 1915 when Governor Ralston received a letter from Juliet V. Strauss, a nationally known writer living in Rockville, Indiana, appealing for help in saving the Turkey Run area in Parke County from being sold to timber interests. The commission created a special parks committee with Richard Lieber, who would become the first director of the Indiana Department of Conservation, as chairman.

While talks for purchasing the Turkey Run property for the state were under way, the commission learned of the opportunity to purchase the rugged area of McCormick’s Creek in Owen County. A total of $5,250 was raised, one-fourth of which by Owen County residents, and McCormick’s Creek became Indiana’s first state park. The commission later acquired the Turkey Run property.

When the last notes of the various pageants faded away and celebrants packed their costumes, the commission attempted to take advantage of the new opportunities presented by the centennial observance. Although a 1917 bill calling for the establishment of a permanent state agency for history failed, the commission was resurrected following World War I to organize a county-by-county war history. Since that time, Indiana has funded a state historical agency (today known as the Indiana Historical Bureau).

           

Ed Breen: Hoosier Journalist

As a teenager growing up in Fort Dodge, Iowa, Edward E. Breen, and many other citizens of the town, were attracted to the downtown one day by news of a major fire. While watching firefighters struggle to put out the flames, Breen noticed a woman with a Minolta Autocord camera around her neck and a power pack slung over her shoulder, without hesitation or explanation, march past the police barricades and into the gaggle of police and firemen.

The woman was Helen Strode, police reporter for the Fort Dodge Messenger and Chronicle, who later served as Breen’s mentor when he became a journalist. “I really liked the idea of going past the barricades, going where others were denied and where I might find something interesting,” Breen recalled.

From the time he started work as a part-time and summer employee at his hometown newspaper through years of dedicated work for the Chronicle-Tribune in Marion and The Journal Gazette in Fort Wayne, Breen found plenty of interesting material to report on and photograph. In a career that included stints as reporter, photographer, city editor, graphics director, features and special projects editor, and managing editor, Breen recognized that the discussions regarding the balance between word and picture content in newspapers ignored the fundamental point: “The purpose and function of each is totally different,” he said. “But both are tools of equal importance in carrying a message to the reader of the printed page.”

Breen has been recognized by his peers as a “pioneer in the early days of full-color newspaper photography, one of those people who made the rest of us realize what was possible,” noted Jack Ronald, publisher of the Portland Commercial Review. Emmett K. Smelser, who first met Breen forty years ago, noted that a visit to the Chronicle-Tribune’s newsroom showed why that newspaper was “considered a national leader in the bold use of color and offset printing,” and why Smelser described his colleague as the “epitome of a news professional—dedicated to his craft, his community and his state.”

Breen’s commitment to the Hoosier State also includes being one of the co-founders of the Mississinewa Battlefield Society, longtime board member for the Indiana Historical Society, columnist for the weekly Marion News Herald, and featured commentator and co-host for WBAT radio’s daily “Good Morning Grant County” program. Not a bad list of accomplishments for someone who had to teach himself how to type to secure his first job in journalism.

In the autumn of 1960 Breen was working as a drugstore soda jerk after classes were finished at his Saint Edmond High School in Fort Dodge and on weekends. One of his customers for the out-of-town newspapers for sale in the store each Sunday was the sports editor of the local newspaper. He asked Breen if he might be interested in working Friday nights in the sports department, taking call-in high school games from the area and writing three-paragraph summaries and statistics. Breen jumped at the opportunity, but came up short when the editor asked him if he could type. He answered “yes,” and spent that weekend teaching himself three-finger typing, started at the newspaper the next Friday night, and “haven’t left the newsroom (in some form) for 56 years,” he said.

After being “tossed out” of Loras College in Dubuque, Iowa, in 1964, Breen found a job as a photographer at the Dubuque Telegraph-Herald. It was there that editor Jim Geladas, a pioneer in the photojournalism world of the 1960s, gave the young Breen the direction and education he needed to become a professional photographer and, “to an extent, a writer.” A former Marine, Geladas ran his newsroom that way. “You learned, by God, or moved on,” said Breen. “He asked much and gave much.”

After marrying Ruth Joanne Schiltz on February 27, 1965, Breen moved to Wisconsin and edited the weekly Plymouth Review. He was there when Dick Martin, who had been his Sunday editor in Dubuque, started as editor of Marion, Indiana’s Leader-Tribune (the morning newspaper that preceded the merger with the Marion Chronicle into the all-day Chronicle Tribune). Martin asked Breen to come to Marion to be a reporter/photographer for $110 a week, a slightly better offer than one he had received from the Milwaukee Journal. “I told Martin I would stay two years,” Breen said. “That was 50 years ago.”

Martin cared deeply about the craft of storytelling and saw that Breen understood how to tell stories with pictures, was a “reasonably good writer,” and gave him the freedom to do both, often on the same assignment. Martin assembled “a sort of magic-moment staff” in Marion, Breen recalled, including Gene Policinski, Phil Witherow, Jerry Miller, and others, that resulted in winning the Hoosier State Press Association’s Blue Ribbon daily newspaper award for several years in a row. Personal honors also came Breen’s way, including Indiana News Photographer of the Year in 1967 and numerous photography and writing awards from the Indiana Associated Press Managing Editors and the Hoosier State Press Association.

Breen moved to the Journal Gazette in August 1995, working as that newspaper’s assistant managing editor for photography and graphics until retiring in July 2009. Craig Klugman, Breen’s editor for nearly fifteen years, noted that his friend liked to say his job at the Fort Wayne newspaper was to “walk around the newsroom, coffee cup in hand, assuring younger staff members that things would be OK. Ed did that, certainly, but he did much more.”

Klugman worked directly with Breen on the newspaper’s Sunday “Perspective” section. The editorial board met every Monday to discuss what was coming up on Sunday. This put Breen in a difficult position, said Klugman, because the editorial staff, by definition, had to talk about positions, while Breen, as a member of the news staff, had to remain objective.

“But Ed handled the problem perfectly,” said Klugman. “He stayed out of any discussions of what we would say. But he always had an answer for how the paper would illustrate a story or essay (not to mention how to focus some of our wide-ranging ideas).” Breen, Klugman added, always “carried himself like the pro he was,” and, even today, more than a decade after leaving daily newspaper journalism, Breen “feels an irresistible pressure to tell stories, to speak truth to power, and to inform.”

Reflecting on his career in newspapers, Breen mused that he had been there for enough of the good years to understand both the importance of journalism and “the joy of doing it well. As John Quinn put it so elegantly, ‘It’s the most fun you can have with your clothes on.’”